You probably didn’t write out a cheque, but you paid.
#Daily nation newspaper kenya friday free#
Mutuma Mathiu, the editorial director of Nation Media Group, wrote the “no free lunch, no free content” column explaining the decision to readers: Subscriptions start at 50Ksh for one week, 150Ksh for one month, or 750Ksh for one year. Capitol riot - users will have to pay up. To read Nation articles more than seven days old - like this report that thousands of students have failed to turn up at schools after their nine-month closure due to Covid-19 or a viral column asking “Who is the banana republic now?” following the U.S. The Nairobi-based newspaper - the largest in Kenya - is adopting a paywall in what appears to be a first for African-owned media in the region. There’s “ no free lunch” and, starting Friday, their journalism will have a price tag, too. The Daily Nation has a message for its readers. This overview is provided for information only and in no way involves the responsibility of the Court.LINK: nation.africa ➚ | Posted by: Sarah Scire | January 29, 2021 In its Judgment, the Court rejected the claim made by Somalia, alleging that Kenya, by its conduct in the disputed area, had violated its international obligations. Kenya is measured, at the point with co‑ordinates 3° 4' 21.3" S and 44° 35' 30.7" E (WGS 84) (Point B)” and that “from Point B, the maritime boundary delimiting the continental shelf continues along the same geodetic line until it reaches the outer limits of the continental shelf or the area where the rights of third States may be affected”. Kenya follows the geodetic line starting with azimuth 114° until it reaches the 200‑nautical‑mile limit measured from the baselines from which the breadth of the territorial sea of . . . It then decided that “from the end of the boundary in the territorial sea (Point A), the single maritime boundary delimiting the exclusive economic zone and the continental shelf up to 200 nautical miles between . . . Kenya is the intersection of the straight line extending from the final permanent boundary beacon (PB 29) at right angles to the general direction of the coast with the low‑water line, at the point with co‑ordinates 1° 39' 44.0" S and 41° 33' 34.4" E (WGS 84)” and that “from the starting-point, the maritime boundary in the territorial sea follows the median line described at paragraph 117 until it reaches the 12‑nautical‑mile limit at the point with co-ordinates 1° 47' 39.1" S and 41° 43' 46.8" E (WGS 84) (Point A)”. The Court decided that “the starting-point of the single maritime boundary delimiting the respective maritime areas between . . . Kenya that follows the parallel of latitude described in paragraph 35 ”.
![daily nation newspaper kenya friday daily nation newspaper kenya friday](http://d.ibtimes.co.uk/en/full/1517034/police-raise-batons-kenya.jpg)
It found that “there is no agreed maritime boundary between . . . The Court delivered its Judgment on the merits of the case on 12 October 2021 by which it determined the maritime boundary between Somalia and Kenya. Kenya did not participate in those hearings. The hearings were held in a hybrid format between 15 and 18 March 2021, with the participation of the delegation of Somalia.
![daily nation newspaper kenya friday daily nation newspaper kenya friday](https://wambuikamiru.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/IMG_20190304_181438_766-1024x1024.jpg)
![daily nation newspaper kenya friday daily nation newspaper kenya friday](https://i.pinimg.com/736x/57/26/b1/5726b1244248df0f511dd2d07bf4f3f0--nelson-mandela-king-jr.jpg)
Public hearings on the merits of the case, initially scheduled to be held from 9 to 13 September 2019, were successively postponed to November 2019, June 2020 and March 2021, following requests for postponements made by Kenya. Somalia on 28 August 2014 and that the application admissible”. After it rejected those objections, the Court found that “it ha jurisdiction to entertain the application filed by . . . On 2 February 2017, the Court rendered its Judgment on the preliminary objections raised by Kenya. On 7 October 2015, Kenya raised preliminary objections to the jurisdiction of the Court and the admissibility of the Application. In addition, Somalia submitted that “the jurisdiction of the Court under Article 36, paragraph 2, of its Statute underscored by article 282 of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea”, which both parties ratified in 1989. In its Application, Somalia requested the Court “to determine, on the basis of international law, the complete course of the single maritime boundary dividing all the maritime areas appertaining to Somalia and to Kenya in the Indian Ocean, including the continental shelf beyond 200 ”.Īs basis for the Court’s jurisdiction, the Applicant invoked the provisions of Article 36, paragraph 2, of the Statute, and referred to the declarations recognizing the Court’s jurisdiction as compulsory made under those provisions by Somalia on 11 April 1963 and by Kenya on 19 April 1965. On 28 August 2014, Somalia filed an Application instituting proceedings against Kenya with regard to a dispute concerning the delimitation of maritime spaces claimed by both States in the Indian Ocean.